The job we have as
up and coming teachers is the task of integrating educational technology into
our practice. The choices available in the market are overwhelming. For some
teachers, the idea of using instructional technology in their pedagogy may be
daunting and sometimes avoided.
Frequently,
teachers use ICTs as substitutive uses that limit the potential for more
ambitious transformative goals. ICTs should be approached as a transformative
tool, rather than merely used for enhancement and replacement of normal
learning tasks.
The SAMR and Bloom’s
Taxonomy provide a framework in which teachers can use to overcome these
barriers. Both frameworks work in a similar fashion which moves from lower
levels to upper levels.
The transitional levels
of the SAMR model (Substitution, Augmentation) are associated with the three
lower levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy (Remember, Understand, Apply). The
transformational levels of SAMR (Modification, Redefinition) are associated
with the upper levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy (Analyze, Evaluate, Create). A similar odering occurs within each grouping.
The following diagram illustrates this association and demonstrates the
similarities of each level between to the two models (Puentedura, 2014).
Source: After Puentedura (2014)
According to
Puentedura (2014), the simple structures outlined above are well suited to
beginning practitioner’s needs; however, the integration of SAMR and Bloom can
provide far more powerful results “involving convergent/divergent branchings,
oscillations between levels.”
Schrock (2015) also
believes that teachers need to use both models in order to create tasks that
target the higher-order cognitive skills (Bloom's), as well as design tasks
that have a significant impact on student outcomes (SAMR).
To begin, it is normal to start
with the lower levels by using simple substitutions of technology and minor
enhancements in order to gain confidence with using technological tools in the
classroom. This enables you to then progress towards the transitional steps of
the models. Reaching these stages of the model enables higher order thinking for
students as this is the ultimate goal of learning.
Examples of intergrating SAMR model in the classrom
SAMR is a model designed to help educators infuse technology into teaching and learning.
Below are some pedagogical examples of how you can integrate the different levels of the SAMR model into classroom practice.
Source: Schrock (2015)
Examples of intergrating Bloom's Taxonomy in the classroom
The Bloom’s
taxonomy model does indicate how technology should be implemented; however, the
verbs in the model suggest active ways that technology can be utilised. Students can create, analyse, synthesise and discover new knowledge with
technology.
Source: Hollis (2015)